That said, the existing, nearly straight-walled, auto-loading remington case (.25. Using as slim and straight-walled a cartridge as possible would’ve been ideal, as the more taper or bottleneck you have the higher the bolt thrust (case walls push back against the chamber), and while a super long, skinny case would be technically ideal, it’d also be generally impractical. I’d assume it was for feed reliability, but it makes delayed-blowback (or straight blowback) weapons design a lot less optimum and makes magazine design more complicated and expensive. I wonder why Pedersen went with such a heavily tapered case. Rear supporting points as locking the toggle. Height thereover would cause to lower the centre axis joint under the front and Height thereunder would cause to open the toggle rather rapidly and holding that Height of which should be precisely computed via experiments as providing necessaryĭelay for the projectile to reach nearly to the exit of the barrel. Points, the front toggle contacts the breechblot at upper support line that the Travel in which the centre axis crossing through below, zero and above of the lock Stoke catches the front toggle deep at its front and after a very short rearward Times upwardly to open side of the connection. Shape that, the recoiling thrust coming from the conrod would force the crank all the Centre toggle axis was made with two loose axis which formed in a Provided the retarding action, simply via rising the front support of conrod, or theįront toggle arm. Intriqued parts is realy confusing and retarding action can only be understoodīy carefuly reading the patent of SN 1737974 text. It seems that, Pedersen’s rifle is one of the most misunderstood mechanism ever
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |